Tulsa, OK vs Worcester, MA
Cost of Living Comparison
Tulsa, OK is more affordable by 13.3 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Tulsa, OK | Worcester, MA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.2 | 102.5 | -13.3 |
| Housing | 68.2 | 113.0 | -44.8 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 97.0 | -3.2 |
| Utilities | 73.9 | 155.2 | -81.3 |
| Other Services | 95.5 | 101.2 | -5.7 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Tulsa, OK | Worcester, MA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $65,784 | $86,708 |
| Median Home Value | $188,400 | $347,400 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $982 | $1,241 |
| Per Capita Income | $36,669 | $44,529 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Tulsa, OK or Worcester, MA cheaper to live in?
Tulsa, OK is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 13.3 index points (Tulsa, OK: 89.2, Worcester, MA: 102.5).
Where is housing cheaper, Tulsa, OK or Worcester, MA?
Housing is more affordable in Tulsa, OK. Housing index: Tulsa, OK (68.2) vs Worcester, MA (113.0).