Rochester, MN vs San Francisco, CA
Cost of Living Comparison
Rochester, MN is more affordable by 24.8 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Rochester, MN | San Francisco, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.8 | 115.6 | -24.8 |
| Housing | 78.6 | 194.7 | -116.1 |
| Goods | 95.4 | 108.5 | -13.0 |
| Utilities | 87.4 | 172.6 | -85.2 |
| Other Services | 92.2 | 106.2 | -14.0 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Rochester, MN | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $86,788 | $129,315 |
| Median Home Value | $266,900 | $1,073,300 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,115 | $2,336 |
| Per Capita Income | $46,938 | $68,958 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rochester, MN or San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
Rochester, MN is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 24.8 index points (Rochester, MN: 90.8, San Francisco, CA: 115.6).
Where is housing cheaper, Rochester, MN or San Francisco, CA?
Housing is more affordable in Rochester, MN. Housing index: Rochester, MN (78.6) vs San Francisco, CA (194.7).