Bakersfield, CA vs San Francisco, CA
Cost of Living Comparison
Bakersfield, CA is more affordable by 14.7 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | San Francisco, CA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 115.6 | -14.7 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 194.7 | -104.4 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 108.5 | -3.3 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 172.6 | -14.3 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 106.2 | -5.9 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | San Francisco, CA |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $129,315 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $1,073,300 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $2,336 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $68,958 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
Bakersfield, CA is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 14.7 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, San Francisco, CA: 115.6).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or San Francisco, CA?
Housing is more affordable in Bakersfield, CA. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs San Francisco, CA (194.7).