Bakersfield, CA vs Omaha, NE
Cost of Living Comparison
Omaha, NE is more affordable by 9.0 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Omaha, NE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 91.9 | +9.0 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 86.4 | +3.9 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 94.1 | +11.1 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 76.4 | +81.9 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 93.0 | +7.3 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Omaha, NE |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $79,634 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $229,500 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $1,101 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $42,050 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Omaha, NE cheaper to live in?
Omaha, NE is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 9.0 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Omaha, NE: 91.9).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Omaha, NE?
Housing is more affordable in Omaha, NE. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Omaha, NE (86.4).