Bakersfield, CA vs Lincoln, NE
Cost of Living Comparison
Lincoln, NE is more affordable by 9.3 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Lincoln, NE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 91.6 | +9.3 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 84.2 | +6.1 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 94.1 | +11.1 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 76.8 | +81.4 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 93.0 | +7.3 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Lincoln, NE |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $70,899 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $238,300 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $994 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $38,382 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Lincoln, NE cheaper to live in?
Lincoln, NE is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 9.3 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Lincoln, NE: 91.6).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Lincoln, NE?
Housing is more affordable in Lincoln, NE. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Lincoln, NE (84.2).