Bakersfield, CA vs Killeen, TX
Cost of Living Comparison
Killeen, TX is more affordable by 9.8 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Killeen, TX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 91.1 | +9.8 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 77.9 | +12.4 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 93.8 | +11.4 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 81.2 | +77.0 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 96.2 | +4.0 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Killeen, TX |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $63,394 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $190,900 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $1,084 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $31,023 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Killeen, TX cheaper to live in?
Killeen, TX is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 9.8 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Killeen, TX: 91.1).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Killeen, TX?
Housing is more affordable in Killeen, TX. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Killeen, TX (77.9).