Bakersfield, CA vs Kansas City, MO
Cost of Living Comparison
Kansas City, MO is more affordable by 8.3 index points
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield, CA | Kansas City, MO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 92.5 | +8.3 |
| Housing | 90.3 | 86.6 | +3.6 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 94.1 | +11.0 |
| Utilities | 158.3 | 89.0 | +69.2 |
| Other Services | 100.3 | 93.4 | +6.9 |
Income & Housing Comparison
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Kansas City, MO |
|---|---|---|
| Median Household Income | $63,883 | $78,827 |
| Median Home Value | $282,800 | $246,000 |
| Median Monthly Rent | $1,161 | $1,148 |
| Per Capita Income | $27,976 | $42,460 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Kansas City, MO cheaper to live in?
Kansas City, MO is more affordable. The cost of living difference is 8.3 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 100.9, Kansas City, MO: 92.5).
Where is housing cheaper, Bakersfield, CA or Kansas City, MO?
Housing is more affordable in Kansas City, MO. Housing index: Bakersfield, CA (90.3) vs Kansas City, MO (86.6).